Up next in 10
Top 10 Differences Between Revenue Recognition in IFRS vs GAAP
0 views
Apr 30, 2025
If you’re involved in accounting, understanding the Top 10 differences between IFRS and GAAP revenue recognition is essential. This video breaks down key contrasts in how each standard treats timing, recognition, and reporting of revenue. Whether you’re a business owner, accountant, or investor, this guide will help you navigate the complexities of global financial reporting.
View Video Transcript
0:00
revenue recognition is one of the most
0:02
critical aspects of financial reporting
0:04
influencing how companies present their
0:06
performance and financial health both
0:09
international financial reporting
0:10
standards IFRS and generally accepted
0:13
accounting principles GOP offer
0:16
structured guidance on when and how to
0:17
recognize revenue but there are key
0:19
differences between the two frameworks
0:22
ifrs is used internationally and is
0:24
principles-based offering broader
0:26
guidelines that require professional
0:28
judgment while GAP primarily used in the
0:31
United States is rules-based with
0:33
detailed instructions for numerous
0:36
industries understanding these
0:38
differences is crucial for investors
0:40
accountants auditors and companies
0:42
operating globally in this video we
0:45
explore the top 10 differences between
0:47
revenue recognition under IFRS and GAP
0:50
helping you navigate the complexities
0:52
and ensure accurate financial reporting
0:55
one principles-based versus rules-based
0:58
approach the fundamental distinction
1:00
between IFRS and GAP revenue recognition
1:03
is that IFRS follows a principles-based
1:06
approach while GAP adopts a more
1:09
rules-based method under IFRS
1:12
specifically
1:13
IFRS15 companies are guided by broad
1:16
principles about recognizing revenue
1:18
when control of goods or services
1:20
transfers to customers gap although now
1:24
aligned with IFRS-15 after ASC 66 still
1:28
retains more detailed and prescriptive
1:30
guidance for specific industries this
1:33
results in GAP providing more explicit
1:36
examples and scenarios whereas IFRS
1:38
leaves more room for interpretation and
1:40
professional judgment based on the facts
1:42
and circumstances of each transaction
1:45
two contract combination criteria when
1:48
it comes to combining contracts IFRS and
1:51
GAP have slightly different criteria
1:54
ifrs tends to combine contracts when
1:57
they are entered into it or near the
1:58
same time with the same customer and
2:00
when they form part of a single
2:02
commercial objective gap has similar
2:05
rules but often requires more stringent
2:07
documentation and evidence that
2:09
contracts are economically linked this
2:12
means companies reporting under GAP must
2:15
be more careful about formal
2:16
documentation when justifying why
2:18
contracts are combined or kept separate
2:21
three identification of performance
2:24
obligations under IFRS companies must
2:27
carefully assess promises in a contract
2:29
to identify distinct performance
2:31
obligations which are elements that
2:33
provide standalone value to the customer
2:36
gap follows similar steps but tends to
2:39
have more specific guidance about when
2:41
multiple promises should be bundled
2:43
together for instance GAP provides more
2:46
detailed examples for bundling goods and
2:49
services that are highly interrelated
2:51
especially in technology and
2:52
construction industries whereas IFRS
2:55
relies more on overarching principles
2:57
and judgment four allocation of
3:00
transaction price both IFRS and GAAP
3:04
require companies to allocate the
3:06
transaction price to performance
3:07
obligations based on standalone selling
3:10
prices but they differ in how flexible
3:12
companies can be ifrs permits more use
3:15
of estimated selling prices when
3:17
observable prices are not available
3:19
offering some flexibility based on
3:21
internal metrics gap although also
3:25
permitting estimates often imposes
3:27
stricter documentation requirements and
3:29
specific methodologies to estimate
3:31
standalone selling prices leading to
3:33
more rigor in application five revenue
3:36
recognition timing for licenses revenue
3:39
recognition for licenses eg software
3:42
intellectual property varies slightly
3:45
under IFRS and GAP
3:48
under IFRS licenses are categorized as
3:51
either providing access over time or
3:53
granting a right to use at a point in
3:55
time based largely on the substance of
3:57
the contract gap similarly distinguishes
4:01
between right to access and right to use
4:04
licenses but offers more detailed
4:06
examples and industry specific guidance
4:09
this often results in subtle differences
4:11
in timing particularly in industries
4:13
like media biotech and technology
4:17
six contract modifications change orders
4:20
ifrs and GAP both require companies to
4:24
account for contract modifications but
4:26
the way modifications are evaluated can
4:28
differ ifrs emphasizes whether the
4:32
modification adds distinct goods or
4:34
services and whether the pricing
4:35
reflects standalone selling prices often
4:38
leading to a separate contract
4:40
gap while aligned conceptually adds more
4:43
detailed criteria and tends to force a
4:46
more granular assessment of whether a
4:47
modification should be accounted for as
4:49
a separate contract or as part of the
4:51
original contract potentially changing
4:54
the revenue timeline seven honorous
4:57
contracts and loss recognition under
4:59
IFRS companies must recognize a
5:02
provision for honorous contracts when
5:04
the unavoidable costs of meeting the
5:06
obligations exceed the expected benefits
5:09
gap does not have a broad concept of
5:11
honorous contracts under revenue
5:13
recognition standards but instead
5:15
addresses expected losses through
5:17
specific guidance in other standards
5:19
like construction accounting eg the
5:21
completed contract method or percentage
5:23
of completion as a result companies
5:26
following IFRS might recognize losses
5:29
earlier than those reporting under
5:31
GAP eight incremental costs of obtaining
5:34
a contract both IFRS and GAAP require
5:39
capitalization of incremental costs of
5:41
obtaining a contract such as sales
5:43
commissions however IFRS allows
5:46
companies to expense these costs if the
5:48
amortization period would be one year or
5:50
less offering a practical expedient gap
5:54
has a similar practical expedient but
5:57
companies under GAAP often encounter
5:59
more detailed guidance on when and how
6:01
to apply it sometimes leading to
6:03
different treatment depending on the
6:05
level of judgment exercised nine
6:08
disclosure requirements while both IFRS
6:11
and GAP emphasize transparency IFRS
6:15
requires slightly less detailed
6:17
disclosure compared to GAP's extensive
6:19
requirements under ASC 66
6:23
under GAP companies must present a lot
6:26
of granular information including
6:28
disagregated revenue by different
6:30
categories detailed information about
6:32
performance obligations and significant
6:34
judgments made ifrs though also
6:37
requiring robust disclosures focuses
6:40
more on providing key principles-based
6:42
information which can lead to less
6:44
exhaustive but more highlevel reporting
6:47
10 transition methods when IFRS-15 and
6:50
ASC 66 were first introduced companies
6:54
had options for transition IFRS allowed
6:57
full retrospective or modified
6:59
retrospective adoption offering
7:01
companies significant
7:03
flexibility gap also offered full
7:06
retrospective or modified retrospective
7:08
methods but with slightly different
7:10
requirements for disclosures and
7:12
reporting comparative periods companies
7:14
operating across jurisdictions sometimes
7:17
faced different transition experiences
7:19
depending on which framework they were
7:21
using leading to timing and presentation
7:23
differences in revenue reporting revenue
7:26
recognition is fundamental to financial
7:28
reporting influencing both earnings and
7:30
investor perceptions of a company's
7:32
performance although IFRS and GAP have
7:36
been aligned through IFRS15 and ASC 66
7:40
notable differences remain in areas such
7:42
as principles versus rules-based
7:44
approaches license revenue timing
7:46
contract modifications and disclosure
7:49
requirements understanding these
7:51
differences is essential for
7:52
multinational companies auditors
7:54
analysts and investors to ensure
7:57
accurate financial statements and
7:58
informed decision-making whether
8:00
navigating performance obligations
8:03
estimating transaction prices or
8:05
addressing contract modifications
8:07
appreciating the nuances between IFRS
8:09
and GAP revenue recognition rules helps
8:12
avoid compliance risks and builds
8:14
stronger more transparent financial
8:16
reporting practices in an increasingly
8:18
interconnected global economy
#Accounting & Auditing
#Bookkeeping
#Business Education
#Business Finance
#Credit Reporting & Monitoring
#Finance
#Financial Planning & Management
#Tax Preparation & Planning