Up next in 10
Top 10 Differences Between GAAP and IFRS in Revenue Recognition
0 views
Apr 16, 2025
GAAP vs. IFRS—what’s the big deal in revenue recognition? This video highlights the top 10 differences between these two global standards. Learn how timing, contracts, and performance obligations vary and why it’s crucial for global companies. Perfect for accounting students, professionals, or anyone curious about financial compliance.
View Video Transcript
0:00
revenue recognition is a critical aspect
0:02
of financial reporting as it directly
0:04
impacts how companies report their
0:06
income in the world of accounting GAP
0:10
generally accepted accounting principles
0:12
and IFRS international financial
0:15
reporting standards are two of the most
0:17
widely used frameworks for preparing
0:19
financial statements while both aim to
0:22
provide clear and accurate financial
0:24
data there are notable differences in
0:26
how they approach revenue recognition
0:28
understanding these differences is
0:30
crucial for multinational companies
0:32
investors and accountants who work in
0:34
environments that require compliance
0:36
with either or both of these standards
0:38
this video outlines the top 10
0:40
differences between GAP and IFRS in the
0:43
area of revenue recognition one revenue
0:47
recognition timing under GAP revenue is
0:50
recognized when it is earned and
0:52
realizable which often occurs when the
0:54
product is delivered or the service is
0:56
performed in contrast IFRS tends to
0:59
focus on when risks and rewards
1:01
associated with ownership of the good or
1:03
service are transferred this can
1:05
sometimes lead to slight differences in
1:07
the timing of revenue recognition as
1:09
IFRS emphasizes the transfer of control
1:12
rather than just the completion of
1:14
performance two contract modifications
1:17
the way contract modifications are
1:19
treated differs under the two standards
1:22
under GAP if a contract is modified and
1:25
the modification creates new obligations
1:28
the contract is considered a new
1:29
contract this means that revenue may be
1:32
recognized differently for the original
1:34
contract versus the modification under
1:37
IFRS contract modifications are
1:40
generally treated as amendments to the
1:41
existing contract and revenue may be
1:44
adjusted accordingly three multiple
1:47
element arrangements under GAP multiple
1:50
element arrangements i.e contracts where
1:53
goods and services are provided together
1:55
require that each element be accounted
1:57
for separately and that revenue is
1:59
allocated to each component based on its
2:01
fair value ifrs however generally allows
2:05
for more flexibility in allocating
2:07
revenue among different elements of the
2:09
arrangement this can result in different
2:11
revenue recognition timelines between
2:13
the two standards when dealing with
2:15
bundled
2:16
contracts four collectibility criteria
2:19
in terms of collectibility GAP has more
2:23
stringent criteria for recognizing
2:25
revenue revenue cannot be recognized
2:27
until there is a reasonable assurance
2:29
that the amount will be collectible in
2:32
comparison IFRS has slightly less strict
2:35
criteria recognizing revenue when it is
2:37
probable that the economic benefits will
2:39
flow to the entity even if
2:41
collectibility is not fully certain five
2:44
principal versus agent considerations
2:47
the distinction between whether an
2:48
entity acts as a principal or an agent
2:50
in a transaction is crucial for revenue
2:53
recognition gap and FRS both require
2:57
careful analysis of whether an entity
2:59
controls the goods or services before
3:01
they are transferred to the customer
3:03
however IFRS has more detailed guidance
3:06
especially in determining whether a
3:08
company is acting as a principal or
3:10
agent in complex transactions like
3:12
online sales or commission-based models
3:15
under GAP this distinction can be a bit
3:18
more flexible depending on how the
3:20
arrangement is structured six timing of
3:23
revenue recognition for construction
3:25
contracts in the case of long-term
3:27
contracts such as construction contracts
3:30
GAP and IFRS treat revenue recognition
3:33
differently gaap often uses the
3:36
percentage of completion method where
3:38
revenue is recognized over the duration
3:40
of the project based on costs incurred
3:43
ifrs also allows the percentage of
3:45
completion method but has more flexible
3:47
rules regarding when the revenue should
3:49
be recognized such as when the outcome
3:51
of the contract can be reliably
3:53
estimated the timing and degree of
3:56
completion can lead to different
3:57
reporting outcomes under the two
3:59
standards seven revenue from software
4:02
and licensing the treatment of revenue
4:04
from software and licensing arrangements
4:06
is another area where GAP and IFRS
4:10
diverge under GAP revenue from software
4:14
is typically recognized when the
4:15
software is delivered and the customer
4:17
has access to it in contrast IFRS may
4:21
require recognizing the revenue over
4:23
time particularly if the software
4:25
involves ongoing support or services
4:28
this difference can lead to significant
4:30
timing differences in how software
4:32
revenue is reported eight discounts
4:35
rebates and returns both GAP and IFRS
4:39
require that companies consider
4:41
discounts rebates and returns when
4:43
recognizing revenue but the approaches
4:45
can differ under GAP companies must
4:49
estimate the amount of revenue that will
4:51
not be collected due to discounts or
4:53
returns and reduce revenue accordingly
4:55
ifrs requires a similar approach but
4:58
tends to emphasize the use of expected
5:00
value or most likely amount methods to
5:02
estimate the impact of returns or
5:05
discounts this subtle difference can
5:07
affect the revenue amounts reported by
5:09
companies nine variable consideration in
5:12
both GAP and IFRS variable consideration
5:17
eg discounts bonuses performance-based
5:20
payments is a significant factor in
5:22
revenue recognition however the two
5:25
standards approach the estimation of
5:27
variable consideration differently gap
5:31
requires a probabilistic approach to
5:33
estimate variable consideration and
5:35
recognizes it when it is highly probable
5:37
that a significant reversal in the
5:39
amount of revenue will not occur ifrs on
5:42
the other hand allows for the use of
5:44
either a probabilistic or expected value
5:46
approach and tends to be more flexible
5:48
in how variable consideration is
5:50
accounted for 10 disclosures and
5:53
presentation finally GAP and IFRS differ
5:57
in their requirements for disclosure and
5:59
presentation of revenue recognition
6:02
practices gap requires more detailed
6:05
disclosures in the form of footnotes
6:07
especially when multiple revenue streams
6:09
are involved ifrs is more focused on
6:12
providing qualitative disclosures such
6:14
as how revenue recognition policies
6:16
align with the transfer of control and
6:19
less focused on quantitative disclosure
6:21
requirements this difference in
6:23
presentation may affect how companies
6:25
communicate their revenue recognition
6:27
policies to stakeholders in conclusion
6:30
GAP and IFRS both provide frameworks for
6:34
recognizing revenue but they diverge in
6:36
several key areas the differences in
6:39
timing methodology and criteria can lead
6:41
to variations in how revenue is
6:43
recognized reported and disclosed while
6:46
these differences are important for
6:48
accountants and auditors to understand
6:50
they also highlight the need for
6:52
multinational companies to ensure
6:53
compliance with the relevant accounting
6:55
standards in the jurisdictions where
6:57
they operate for businesses that operate
6:59
internationally or are planning to
7:01
expand globally understanding these
7:03
differences is crucial in preparing
7:05
financial statements that are both
7:07
accurate and compliant with local
7:09
regulations as the world continues to
7:11
globalize it's possible that more
7:13
harmonization between GAP and IFRS will
7:16
occur but for now these distinctions
7:19
remain significant in the accounting and
7:21
financial reporting landscapes
#Accounting & Auditing
#Billing & Invoicing
#Bookkeeping
#Business Education
#Other
#Tax Preparation & Planning